Uranium Information CentreMelbourne, Australia | |
![]() |
Analyst guide - sourcesRecommended sourcesThe following are reputable, based on sound information and involving the processing of that by people familiar with the industry: World Nuclear Association market report 2007 (published every two years): The global nuclear fuel market: supply and demand 2007-2030 The "Red Book" 2006 (published every two years): Uranium 2005: Resources, Production and Demand A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency OECD Nuclear Energy Agency 2007 Nuclear Energy Data 2007 (annual) Cambridge Energy Research Associates, USE, notably Crossing the Divide? The Future of Clean Energy, 2007.Eurelectric, March 2007, The Role of Electricity - A new path to secure, competitive energy in a carbon-constrained world. Qualified recommendationThe following are sound and estimable in many respects but in our view fail to take properly into account certain significant apects of their subject relevant to uranium or nuclear power: World Energy Outlook 2007, from OECD International Energy Agency (annual). This is a very valuable report overall but understates the likely role of nuclear power in policy scenarios. MIT report 2003 The Future of Nuclear Power. This is sceptical of US policy and with high cost estimates for new reactor construction, but generally positive about expansion of nuclear power. University of Sydney commissioned report for Australian UMPNER: Life-cycle Energy Balance and Greenhouse gas Emissions of Nuclear Energy in Australia, 2006. This is a sound independent study but uses unduly high energy input figures for uranium enrichment (based on obsolete plant).Deficient sourcesThe following are put together and published by people and organistaions who are either not engaged or up to speed with major aspects of uranium and nuclear power or evidently running an agenda to denigrate it: Energy Watch Group, 2006, Uranium Resources and Nuclear Energy. Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen, 2007, Nuclear power - the energy balance, energy insecurity and greenhouse gases - divorced from the industry and ignores relevant empirical data. Updated from previous versions which were wrong on key matters by a wide margin. See critique at Melbourne University Physics and WNA paper Oxford Research Group, London especially: Secure Energy? Civil Nuclear Power, Security and Global Warming, 2007, which argues that nuclear energy make a negligible contribution to lowering CO2 emissions and to energy security; and Too Hot To Handle? The Future of Civil Nuclear Power, 2007, which argues that a worldwide nuclear renaissance is beyond the capacity of the nuclear industry to deliver. WNN comment on latter.UIC/WNA papers likely to be of most relevance to analystsThe following are some of the mines, briefing papers and other resources on this site which are most relevant to routine analysts:
|
![]() |
other than the text of Nuclear Electricity may be used or reproduced freely, with acknowledgement.
For further information |
GPO Box 1649, Melbourne 3001, Australia
phone (03) 8616 0440
URL - http://www.uic.com.au
Email :
no spam
Site Updated : Weekly